Posted 11 9 2012

1. bridgetbadore likes this
2. goodbyejulia said: Unless it has to do with the intention, process or intervening historical context, gender is irrelevant. Do women have to create under pseudonyms, not just to be taken seriously, but to circumvent this unnecessary discourse? I refuse to accept that.
3. longhairshorttemper likes this
4. emmetreads said: The reviewer is, literally, a Dick.
5. streetleveljapan likes this
6. 3dprintmeafucktogive said: Congratulations!
7. porfinloca said: puff, it’s sad. keep making your art.
8. micromassive likes this
9. undinae reblogged this from jessicaeaton
10. remove likes this
11. lucasgabellinifava likes this
12. kkeennyy likes this
13. danielgraham likes this
14. juophoto said: wow! I love your work Jessica and never once considered that “only a guy can do it” I think you are working in a very modern method and that modernist concept is pan sexual. That you are a human first, artist second, and Canadian third. <3
15. neoncrayon likes this
16. poopflex likes this
17. sshizzle likes this
18. wildthinginsideus likes this
19. hbliss said: “Some of my best friends are female formalists.” he’s such a prick it’s borderline parody
20. bmichael likes this
21. kvencill said: The dudes name is appropriate.
22. wigglygiggle reblogged this from jessicaeaton and added:

    nothing: The writer’s name is quite appropriate. “This is the kind of art a guy would make.” Yikes.

23. artyucko likes this
24. towerofsleep likes this
25. jessicaeaton posted this